Published time: 11 Jan, 2016 13:32
The report, released by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) as the House of Lords prepares to debate the bill on Monday, found “the regressive nature of measures” may violate the UK’s obligations under international human rights treaties.
Loran McGregor, a member of the EHRC, said: “As it stands, the Trade Union Bill is in danger of imposing potentially unlawful restrictions on everyone’s basic human right to strike.
The legislation would impose several new hurdles for strikers, including the mandated selection of a picket supervisor who must wear an identifying badge and give personal details to the police. The Bill would also give ministers the power to make amendments to legislation concerning the amount of time members can spend on union activities at work, known as facility time, within the public sector.
“In the Commission’s analysis, these open-ended powers could be used to introduce disproportionate interference to freedom of association rights under Article 11 [of the European Convention on Human Rights],” the report says.
“We have carefully considered all of the legal issues throughout the passage of the Bill and are completely satisfied that we are compliant with our international obligations,” he said.
Trade Union Congress (TUC) General Secretary Frances O’Grady said: “This Bill isn’t about how many people vote in a strike ballot. It’s about the government’s real plan: taking power away from workers and giving it to the bosses.
“People aren’t stupid. They know who this Bill is really for.”
Labour estimates it could lose up to £6 million (US$8.7 million) in funding from the change, according to a leaked document seen by the Guardian.
Former Labour General Secretary Lord Collins told the newspaper: “These changes are entirely partisan, unfair and going to hit the income of the party and union political funds very hard.
“No balancing measure is being taken to cap the donations of the Conservative Party.”